Interesting. Rule 869 says that “A registered person is a player” and secures registration (with power=3). Rule 1551 (Ratification) has power 3.1, so it’s actually possible that ratification could register someone. I don’t think that’s desireable; if nothing else, someone made a player by ratification hasn’t agreed to follow the rules, and there are some troubling questions of consent.
Any idea how to represent your indeterminate state in the reports? -o > On Apr 20, 2017, at 2:13 AM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it needs to note that I supposedly became a player or once it self > ratifies it will make me a player regardless? (I might CFJ on that concept > of playership by ratification just to find out) > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 21:12 Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca > <mailto:o...@grimoire.ca>> wrote: > The following is a DRAFT of the upcoming Referee’s report. The content makes > some assumptions about Quazie’s ultimate fate. > > Suggestions encouraged! > > -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
