> On Jan 16, 2017, at 9:00 PM, nichdel <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/16/2017 06:25 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > > I hope not, but the wording of that clause is not great. My intention was > > that a sale stays open until someone buys it, not that it stays open until > > either someone buys it or an Agoran Decision is resolved. The “in-scope” > > constraint was meant to begin at the moment the sale contract is created, > > which I think is implied but is definitely not stated explicitly. > > > > Ideas? > > Best to make it explicit, I think: "...has not, since the creation of > the contract, voted..." > > I'm highly suspicious that the AVM charter is overwrought, but I haven't > given it a serious enough examination to try simplifying yet.
I wouldn’t doubt it. I suspected as much when I realized I needed to write a summary for it. Even then, it’s still buggy. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
