> On Jan 16, 2017, at 1:58 AM, nichdel <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 01/07/2017 04:00 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> An Agoran Decision is within the scope of a sale contract if the seller has >> not >> yet voted in a number of resolved Agoran Decisions equal to the vote count of >> that contract. For the purposes of this Charter, the seller has voted in an >> Agoran Decision if and only if they have cast a valid ballot on that >> decision, >> and not retracted or replaced it, and the Agoran Decision has been resolved. >> > Does that mean if nobody takes your offer by the time I resolve the > outstanding decision, it's taken off the market? That seems frustrating > if I want to keep a standing sale. Maybe have a way to over-ride this? > Also maybe an optional "exclude proposals fitting this description" > field so you can keep a vote available on, say, anything you haven't > submitted. > > As-is I'm weary to list a vote to have it either used directly against > myself or not used at all, leading to re-listing.
I hope not, but the wording of that clause is not great. My intention was that a sale stays open until someone buys it, not that it stays open until either someone buys it or an Agoran Decision is resolved. The “in-scope” constraint was meant to begin at the moment the sale contract is created, which I think is implied but is definitely not stated explicitly. Ideas? I did intend for the case where someone sells a vote which is subsequently used against them, though. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
