Sorry. Typo. I meant statement. -Aris
On Saturday, September 17, 2016, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tend to agree. I mean, the stamens is true, but you're judging the case > false? Or am I getting this wrong? > > -Aris > > On Saturday, September 17, 2016, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk');>> wrote: > >> On Sat, 2016-09-17 at 14:26 +0000, Alexis Hunt wrote: >> > The final issue of the case is to assign a valid judgement to the CFJ. >> My >> > options, per rule 591, are TRUE, FALSE, and DISMISS. DISMISS is not >> > appropriate in the circumstances, based on the facts of the case at the >> > time the CFJ was initiated and the text of rule 591, but the rules >> > otherwise provide no guidance as to preferring TRUE over FALSE. Thus, I >> > judge this CFJ FALSE. >> >> Beautiful. I suppose this relies on an argument that TRUE is not the >> same thing as true? >> >> -- >> ais523 >> >
