On Sun, 10 Jul 2016, nichdel wrote:
> Here's my idea of a fix for deputisation: make special deputisation a
> 'type' of deputisation and separate 'deputisation' into 'normal' and
> 'expedient' where normal works mostly as before and expedient allows
> changes without intent announcement if the office is empty or the duty
> is more than two weeks late.
>
> I submit the following proposal:
I like allowing for special deputization elsewhere. But I think that
having 'normal' and 'expedited' as wholly separated processes is unneeded
complication. How about just amending (c) in the first part like this:
> (c) The deputy announced between two and fourteen days earlier
> that e intended to deputise for that office for the
> purposes of the particular action.
to
> (c) Either (i) The deputy announced between two and fourteen days
earlier that e intended to deputise for that office for the
purposes of the particular action; or (ii) the office is
vacant; or (iii) the aforementioned time limit expired more
than 14 days ago.
