On Sat, 25 Jul 2015, Kerim Aydin wrote:
In interpreting the functioning of assets, assets should generally
be assumed to be indivisible physical objects in the possession of
their owners, and that transfers between owners are "in person".
Given that the common sense meaning of "physical object" is almost the complete opposite of "legal fiction", and given that Agoran assets would certainly be the latter, i don't like this phrasing.
Greetings, Ørjan.
