On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Henri Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote: > Because of this it is a pain to try to identify the author of a > message if they didn't sign their message and their email name is not > their "name".
Well... you could have required that the author be identified in some way in the message, rather than forcing it to be at the end. Especially when the end may sometimes be a block quote. I also have gotten confused with Roujo, Yally, etc., so I'm not sure I'd oppose such a version (although judging by eir message, I think Roujo would - then again, e did possibly inadvertently help the current version pass!). In any case, IMHO, it would be nice if you had included comments / invited discussion at the beginning rather than letting it pass by chaos. > By the way, if you didn't spend time thinking up clever omd acronyms, > you wouldn't be quite as annoyed. Peh! ;) - obstinate, moderately defensive
