On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 5:10 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > > The present identification rule is annoying enough without having to > be mean about it. > > - offering marked displeasure
What is annoying about Mandatory Identification? You simply type "-omd" at the end of your messages, and that's all you need to do. The reason I proposed Mandatory Identification was because some people have Agoran names differing from their e-mail names. For example, xx1122334455 signs his messages with "LiberonScien" yet his e-mail name is "xx1122334455", and Jon's Agoran name is "Roujo" yet his email name is "Jon". Because of this it is a pain to try to identify the author of a message if they didn't sign their message and their email name is not their "name". If you're still opposed to it, then we will have to repeal it because it seems to be a huge problem. By the way, if you didn't spend time thinking up clever omd acronyms, you wouldn't be quite as annoyed. -Henri
