Is there a penalty for deputising incorrectly?

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> There is currently no reward for Deputisation (except we might say thanks :) 
> ).
>
> The relevant part of Rule 1607 is here:
>
>        The Mutability Index (MI) is a Budget Switch.
>
>        A proposal that was in the Proposal Pool at the beginning of a
>        given week is a pending proposal.
>
>        The Promotor CAN distribute a proposal which is in the Proposal
>        Pool at any time.
>
>        In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
>        weekly duties:
>        a) distribute MI pending proposals (or all, if there are
>           fewer than MI of them) such that the sum of the
>           Distributabilities of the distributed proposals is
>           maximised, and
>        b) distribute all disinterested pending proposals.
>
>
> Since you CAN only deputise something that SHALL be done, what this means is,
> in order to deputise, you have to distribute the correct set of Distributable
> proposals and ALL disinterested ones (you can't just do some, if you try to
> do some, you won't have fulfilled this duty, and the deputisation fails).
>
> ANOTHER option, though, is to Assume the office, distribute a few of them,
> then resign the office.  That way, you're safe from doing it wrong.
>
> -G.
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Henri Bouchard wrote:
>
>> Also, what is the meaning of MI?
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Henri Bouchard <henrib...@gmail.com> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>       If the Promotor office is vacant, how are we making and voting on
>> >>       proposals? From my understanding, the Promotor is responsible for
>> >>       recieving and distributing proposals. If there is no Promotor, who 
>> >> is
>> >>       receiving and distributing proposals at this time?
>> >>
>> >>       -Henri
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Yes, you've identified a problem.
>> >
>> > I have thought about deputizing to do so, but I realized that I would
>> > need to know the sum(MI) of all proposals, or a deputization might
>> > platonically fail.
>> >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to