There is currently no reward for Deputisation (except we might say thanks :) ).

The relevant part of Rule 1607 is here:

       The Mutability Index (MI) is a Budget Switch.

       A proposal that was in the Proposal Pool at the beginning of a
       given week is a pending proposal.

       The Promotor CAN distribute a proposal which is in the Proposal
       Pool at any time.

       In a given Agoran week, the Promotor SHALL, as part of eir
       weekly duties:
       a) distribute MI pending proposals (or all, if there are
          fewer than MI of them) such that the sum of the
          Distributabilities of the distributed proposals is
          maximised, and
       b) distribute all disinterested pending proposals.


Since you CAN only deputise something that SHALL be done, what this means is, 
in order to deputise, you have to distribute the correct set of Distributable
proposals and ALL disinterested ones (you can't just do some, if you try to
do some, you won't have fulfilled this duty, and the deputisation fails).

ANOTHER option, though, is to Assume the office, distribute a few of them,
then resign the office.  That way, you're safe from doing it wrong.

-G.


On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Henri Bouchard wrote:

> Also, what is the meaning of MI?
> 
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Sean Hunt wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Henri Bouchard <henrib...@gmail.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >>       If the Promotor office is vacant, how are we making and voting on
> >>       proposals? From my understanding, the Promotor is responsible for
> >>       recieving and distributing proposals. If there is no Promotor, who is
> >>       receiving and distributing proposals at this time?
> >>
> >>       -Henri
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes, you've identified a problem.
> >
> > I have thought about deputizing to do so, but I realized that I would
> > need to know the sum(MI) of all proposals, or a deputization might
> > platonically fail.
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to