On 11 July 2013 05:13, John Smith <spamba...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I CfJ on "Would paying omd to not post on the public forums as part of a > legally binding agreement between myself and omd cause a violation of Rule > 101?" >
When you say 'legally binding', are you referring to Agoran, or US law (or the law of some other jurisdiction external to Agora)? With respect to Agoran law, I think omd would have a good case that such an agreement could not succeed in binding him to its terms, unless it was effected by an instrument with Power > 3. That is, I think R101(v) (or even R101(ii)) would protect omd from incurring any Agoran penalties for violating the terms of the agreement. In this I may differ from Goethe, who seems to think it might depend on how severe the penalties were. -- Steve Gardner Research Grants Development Faculty of Business and Economics Monash University, Caulfield campus Rm: S8.04 | ph: (613) 9905 2486 e: steven.gard...@monash.edu *** NB I am now working 1.0 FTE, but I am away from my desk** on alternate Thursday afternoons (pay weeks). *** Two facts about lists: (1) one can never remember the last item on any list; (2) I can't remember what the other one is.
