On 4 Jul 2013, at 16:42, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:18 AM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Contract requirements aren't implicit, they're just indirect. How >> about "SHALL NOT, except where otherwise explicitly permitted"? And >> stick in "players MAY destroy their own Yaks" or whatever. > > Actually, that's probably a bad idea. Anyway, here's my version:
BTW, another reason to generalise is so we don't have to deal with new bugs every time the economic system changes. -- Walker
