On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Charles Walker <charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't see the fix. > > "CAN but SHALL NOT, except where *explicitly* required"?
Contract requirements aren't implicit, they're just indirect. How about "SHALL NOT, except where otherwise explicitly permitted"? And stick in "players MAY destroy their own Yaks" or whatever.
