My dim recollection is that it took a kind of high level scam (in the sense of loophole exploitation, there was no attempt to win) to move away from the Mutable/Immutable distinction. But we didn't get straight to the Power system - that came later. The intermediate stage involved the definition of a class of 'Semimutable' rules. A loophole permitted these to take precedence over the Immutable Rules, and hence (temporarily) to amend Immutable Rules with less than unanimous support.
-- Steve Gardner via mobile On 2 Jul 2013 09:16, "Ørjan Johansen" <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jul 2013, Chuck Carroll wrote: > > I also have an idea or two about how a group of players could get around >> the >> requirement of unanimity for making a rule mutable against a single player >> determined to prevent all such transmutations. >> > > My vague memory is that something like that is how Agora got its > Mutable/Immutable distinction changed into the Power system - I think there > were no votes requiring unanimity involved. > > Greetings, > Ørjan.
