On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 13:31 -0700, omd wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As Assessor, I note that means Murphy's most recent attempts to > > > resolve 7435-7443 were correct. In particular, 7436 was adopted, > > > scshunt's attempts to award Lime Ribbons for 7436 were valid, and > > > 7437-7443 all failed quorum, except for 7442, which did not exist. > > > Out of those, I gratuitously determine that 7441 (Vigintennial stuff) > > > is probably too stale (it was originally distributed almost a month > > > ago), but return the rest (7437-7440 and 7443) to the Proposal Pool > > > per R2350. > > > > CoE: I can't do this because it's been more than 7 days. Roujo, > > ais523, woggle, Walker, scshunt, Machiavelli, you're on your own. > > Time to do a total copout, I guess, given that I'm not paying enough > attention to sort this out by myself: > > For each colour of ribbon, I attempt to award myself a ribbon of that > colour.
I think instead of kudos, we should start awarding dope slaps. Or maybe give the Herald a rubber chicken.
