On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Sean Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We vote AGAINST. Perhaps it's because we missed the enacting of Rule >> 2380, but we were not amused by this scam, and amusement is important >> to us. We reserve the right to change our vote should amusement >> materialize in the near future. Perhaps an interpretive dance would >> help. > > Hmm... I must say, I'm not sure that any dance I attempted would be powerful > enough.
Perhaps the lack of confidence saps your creative ability to produce a sufficiently powerful dance. In its absence, one could always resort to bribery. --Wes
