On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 12:50 -0400, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > FOR. Taunting the police sounds like fun, but I fail to see *why* one > would ever do that.
I mentioned it in my votes, but because it's kind-of buried and hard to see, and to expand on it: you can promise to taunt the police under certain circumstances as a method of, effectively, promising /not/ to do something. That was the original purpose of the rule back when it first existed (with contracts, rather than promises); I vaguely remember it being made into a win condition but can't remember why. Perhaps we should just put it back to the original, non-win-condition, version. -- ais523
