On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:29 AM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Tanner Swett <swe...@mail.gvsu.edu> wrote: >> I call a CFJ on the following statement: A person CAN violate Rule 101 >> by failing to treat Agora right good forever without violating any >> other regulation found in Rule 101. > > Evidence: CFJ 2515.
I intend, with such-and-such support, to file a Motion to Reconsider CFJ 2515. Arguments: in my opinion, the requirement is too vague to be enforceable. —Machiavelli
