On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:29 AM, omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Tanner Swett <swe...@mail.gvsu.edu> wrote:
> >> I call a CFJ on the following statement: A person CAN violate Rule 101
> >> by failing to treat Agora right good forever without violating any
> >> other regulation found in Rule 101.
> >
> > Evidence: CFJ 2515.
>
> I intend, with such-and-such support, to file a Motion to Reconsider
> CFJ 2515. Arguments: in my opinion, the requirement is too vague to be
> enforceable.
If a non-Appeals judicial case (1) has a judgement that has been
in effect for less than seven days and not been appealed,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[FWIW, I agree with you].
