On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Wes Contreras wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > I considered this, but figured that it would give someone joining > > after many people were weeded out an unfair advantage. Best I can > > suggest here is multiple rounds? -G. > > Or give some (possibly difficult) mechanism to get back into the > running after becoming absent?
Ah, how's vote on every proposal released in X time (say 4 weeks), and at least Y proposals total (say, 6)?
