On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Sean Hunt wrote: >> I thought quite closely about the Prerogative of Prejudice. I wanted >> something cool and powerful, but not entirely absurd. My rationale is >> that Prejudice is not truly a just punishment, and should not be >> considered a judicial resolution to controversy per R101. > > I'm reading Prejudice through a few times and may have some comments; but > I agree, I'm not so concerned about criminal mechanics - even "unfair" > ones if they're basically playable - as I would be about R101 (inquiry) > cases. So that's all good.
Sorry, I'd forgotten that there was another R101 right in play, and that is "Every person has the right to cause formal reconsideration of any judicial determination that e should be punished." Prejudice could bump up against it, but hopefully it would be interpreted as not truly being judicial (although it is clearly Judicial ;) ). -scshunt
