On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Sean Hunt wrote: > I think that the analogy is apt, and we can conclude that > the owner at the end is simply undefined, and that is in fact crucial, > because of Rule 2166: "If an asset would otherwise lack an owner, it > is owned by the Lost and Found Department." I feel that this decision > fits with the common sense and best interest of the game.
Bravo.
