On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:06 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 02:03 -0400, omd wrote: >> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: >> > I judge CFJ 3190 NOT GUILTY (1504(a)). Arguably, also (d), but (a) is >> > more clearcut. >> >> I intend, with two support, to make this case Notable. > > I support. (What sort of annotation are you planning?)
That selecting a confusing nickname need not be for oneself, but a nickname is only "selected" if it sticks (is likely to stick?). (I personally disagree with both of these, but not enough to try to appeal.)
