On 12/21/2011 11:30 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Pavitra wrote: >> On 12/20/2011 04:22 PM, John Smith wrote: >>>> This message is a Delve, satisfying the Goals 2205 and 2338. >>> >>> The only Delve was cashing a promise, which relied critically on >>> 2338. You could have submitted the same judicial arguments even if >>> Rule 2205 did not exist. >> >> I could have published the same text, but it is not obvious to me that >> the text would have been judicial arguments in any rule-defined sense >> without 2205. >> >>> (Note that the CfJ's judgment is not a part Delve since it cites >>> neither rule in its Judge's Arguments; they were clearly cited after >>> the end of the arguments.) >> >> The Delve is the entire series of moves taken in the message in question. > > The Delving Period ended a while ago (November). Something is only a Delve > if it was submitted during the Delving Period.
Oh, right. Oh well.
