On Tue, 20 Dec 2011, Pavitra wrote: > On 12/20/2011 04:22 PM, John Smith wrote: > >> This message is a Delve, satisfying the Goals 2205 and 2338. > > > > The only Delve was cashing a promise, which relied critically on > > 2338. You could have submitted the same judicial arguments even if > > Rule 2205 did not exist. > > I could have published the same text, but it is not obvious to me that > the text would have been judicial arguments in any rule-defined sense > without 2205. > > > (Note that the CfJ's judgment is not a part Delve since it cites > > neither rule in its Judge's Arguments; they were clearly cited after > > the end of the arguments.) > > The Delve is the entire series of moves taken in the message in question.
The Delving Period ended a while ago (November). Something is only a Delve if it was submitted during the Delving Period. -G.
