On 24 October 2011 03:49, Pavitra <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote: > *sigh* > > The point of a CfJ is to _resolve controversy_. You could give that > argument for any question about which people disagree.
++
On 24 October 2011 03:49, Pavitra <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote: > *sigh* > > The point of a CfJ is to _resolve controversy_. You could give that > argument for any question about which people disagree.
++