On 10/23/2011 09:47 PM, omd wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3109 >> >> ============================== CFJ 3109 ============================== >> >> Bucky has satisfied the Victory Condition of Being Bucky >> >> ======================================================================== > > Honestly, if different people reasonably interpret the same trivial > statement, under the same set of facts, as being true, false, and > nonsensical, I'm going to go with "too vague". > > UNDETERMINED
*sigh* The point of a CfJ is to _resolve controversy_. You could give that argument for any question about which people disagree.
