On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 13:54 -0500, Pavitra wrote: > I proto the following proposal, "Temporal Anomaly", AI=3:
This is going to be absolute chaos. Probably best to allow date-stamps in the body of the message to take precedence, especially due to the existence of "received:" headers, or it might be technically annoying to use. A bad idea? Probably, but I'm willing to try it and see what happens. (I'm not sure you'll get the AI 3 you need, though.) -- ais523
