On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 15:51 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> I CFJ on the following statement: > >> I intend to become a player at this time. > >> I retract the above CFJ. > > > > I support and do so. > > Linked CFJs: > > * G. became a player as a result of eir message quoted in evidence. > > * G. became a player as a result of ais523's message quoted in > evidence. > > Evidence: the above-quoted text. > > Arguments: G.'s message probably sufficed to trigger Rule 869, but I > don't remember whether there's precedent for this particular form (if > there is, then I'll retract these cases).
Gratuitous: CFJ 2979 says the that nesting a registration message in a CFJ statement *doesn't* work but CFJ 2980 says that adding "I do so" does the trick. I'm wondering if retracting the CFJ leaves the statement behind or is just additional confirmation of nullification.
