> On 22 July 2011 10:00, Arkady English <arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The term "Secured" is not defined anywhere in the rules > > Rule 1688/6 (Power=3) > Power > [snip: definition of "secures"] > -- > Charles Walker
Yeah, I think this is the more pressing issue here :) But R689, why is the first-class distinction made? Is there some good reason it's not "A player who is not a person and has never been a person?" -Turiski
