On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 04:00, Arkady English <arkadyenglish+ag...@gmail.com> wrote: > I announce that I deregister the President. > > I call a CFJ on the statement "The president has been deregistered" > submitting the following statement/evidence: > > > Rule 2326/2 states "The President is a second-class person. Causing the > President to act is secured." > > The term "Secured" is not defined anywhere in the rules, hence I argue it > hasn't really got any legal meaning - does it mean that, once caused to act > no-one can undo the action, or that no-one can cause the president to act in > ways not defined in the rules? This ambiguity robs the second sentance of > all legal weight. > > Rule 869/32 states "A player who is not a person and has never been a > first-class person CAN be deregistered by any player by announcement." > > This conflicts with: > > "A first-class Player CAN cause the President to take actions Without > Objection, or with Agoran Consent." (Rule 2326/2). > > Summarising rule 1030/9, to determine which statement takes precedence: > > - Power (both rules are Power 2) > - Neither calls for alternative method for precidence. > - Neither claims precidence over, nor defers to the other explicitly. > - Rule 869/32 has the lower ID number, and hence takes precidence. > > Therefore the president can be deregistered by announcement. > > > Arkady.
I'm not sure I understand. Even if the word "secured" is ambiguous and means nothing, why would the sentence "The President is a second-class person" not make the President a person? The President is a player and a person, and so your 869 excerpt doesn't work on the President.
