On Sun, 15 May 2011, Ed Murphy wrote: > Bucky wrote: > > Gratuitous Arguments: > > The precedent from CfJ 2884 that non-registered people may register by > > announcement (in addition to the normal method) is relevant to this case. > > Given the contents of Rule 2288 (Induction), it is clear that the precedent > > extends to registering by Agoran Consent. > > The question is not whether the Induction rule works in general, but > how R1728(b)(3) (i.e. one person announcing intent and a different > person performing the action) applies. It's most often used with > actions like "appealing a case" or "making a player inactive", where > it's usually not so important /who/ performs the action, just that it > gets performed. How it interacts with actions where the identity of > the actor is clearly significant-- there may be precedent, but I don't > remember it offhand, and I'm pretty sure there isn't any precedent for > registration in particular (which has different standards than typical > actions performed by announcement).
It's also very relevant that e published a clear and unambiguous intent to register.
