Bucky wrote: > Gratuitous Arguments: > The precedent from CfJ 2884 that non-registered people may register by > announcement (in addition to the normal method) is relevant to this case. > Given the contents of Rule 2288 (Induction), it is clear that the precedent > extends to registering by Agoran Consent.
The question is not whether the Induction rule works in general, but how R1728(b)(3) (i.e. one person announcing intent and a different person performing the action) applies. It's most often used with actions like "appealing a case" or "making a player inactive", where it's usually not so important /who/ performs the action, just that it gets performed. How it interacts with actions where the identity of the actor is clearly significant-- there may be precedent, but I don't remember it offhand, and I'm pretty sure there isn't any precedent for registration in particular (which has different standards than typical actions performed by announcement).
