On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, Charles Walker wrote: > For the record, I don't think that this sets the precedent which > Quazie and G. are saying it does as the requirements for registering > are deliberately more lenient than the requirements for any other > action. A state verb would most likely fail to meet the requirements > for a normal action, where the rules about ambiguity are rather more > strict.
I'll buy that. -G.
