On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Charles Walker
<charles.w.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that "I'm a player if anyone wants me to be." pretty clearly
> fits the "reasonably clearly and reasonably unambiguously"
> requirement. It's fairly obvious that people want Quazie to be a
> player (ehird even provided evidence to that fact). By contrast, If
> Quazie had said "I will become a player is anyone wants me too", then
> this might not have been clear enough, because of the "at that time"
> requirement.
>
> CFJ 2991: TRUE
> CFJ 2992: TRUE
>
> --
> Charles Walker
>
There is a meta question involved with CFJ 2991, mostly are state
verbs able to be used in place of action verbs ('I am a player' vs 'I
become a player') - it seems to me that by CFJ 2991 being judged true
then we are setting a precedent that state verbs are equivalent to
action verbs.
