omd wrote: > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Ed Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >> Gratuitous: >> >> As the third panelist in 2926a, I can no longer fulfill my Rule 911 >> duty to opine without violating my Rule 2157 duty to prevent the >> panel from violating Rule 1727. > > *1769? But judgement need not be rendered until 72 hours after the > holiday, so you can legally opine between 0 and 72 hours after.
Ah, right, I need to remember to do that then.
