I wrote: > ais523 wrote: > >> On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 18:52 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> scshunt wrote: >>> >>>> On 10-12-19 08:53 PM, ais523 wrote: >>>>> Err, wasn't scshunt sitting? Also, I'm quoting the entire message as it >>>>> seems to make no sense. >>>>> >>>> >>>> err wait. yes I was. >>> >>> To clarify, scshunt was (I think) sitting when e was assigned to 2924 >>> (due to previously assigning emself to the -1 CFJs); e judged 2924, >>> stood up, and was assigned to 2926. >> >> I'm also wondering why you submitted caller's arguments on a CFJ you >> didn't call. > > omd quoted one of my messages immediately before initiating the case.
...though, checking the archives, 2924 doesn't appear to have any particular connection to 854 in particular; it turns out to be a repeat of CFJ 18.
