On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 18:52 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > scshunt wrote: > > > On 10-12-19 08:53 PM, ais523 wrote: > >> Err, wasn't scshunt sitting? Also, I'm quoting the entire message as it > >> seems to make no sense. > >> > > > > err wait. yes I was. > > To clarify, scshunt was (I think) sitting when e was assigned to 2924 > (due to previously assigning emself to the -1 CFJs); e judged 2924, > stood up, and was assigned to 2926.
I'm also wondering why you submitted caller's arguments on a CFJ you didn't call. -- ais523
