On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:13 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> I believe the last line is part of this proposal. > > Arguably, it fails altogether due to ambiguity.
Psychohistory is always ambiguous when it comes to specifics, but it *never* fails altogether. (unless you're the Mule and/or ehird.)
