On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:34 PM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Surely the common-sense interpretation is that e reserves the right to > change the AI later, e.g. via veto?
I wouldn't say so; "A=Y" is only equivalent to "A is Y" in very awkward speech, and game custom suggests e was attempting to use Mutable as an index.
