On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, ais523 wrote: > Repealing rule 104 would surely cause a max exodus of everyone who cared > about Agora, thus causing the game to break. Thus, the game would be > broken by the repeal, and thus the proposal arguably fails to fulfil > Fearmonger duties.
Heh. Gratuitous: I am still required to submit a proposal attempting the repeal of the randomly-chosen rule, and there is no "minimal set of other rule changes" that would fix this non-technical break. Also, surely this "break" will only happen if this is voted in, and if it is voted in at AI-3, then surely those who did so would not be part of said exodus? [Not part of the gratuitous: I personally wonder about the "specify only to amend its rule" clause. Arguably that means I'm required to write only "Amend rule X" without specifying an actual textual amendment.]
