Warrigal wrote: > Should I bother calling an inquiry case on whether this message > performs the action quoted below? I think it should, though I have not > kept up with cases lately, so I don't know whether it does. > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Warrigal <ihope12...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:15 AM, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >>>> coppro wrote: >>>> >>>>> I transfer a prop from Yally to Warrigal, as Yally inexcusably missed >>>>> Warrigal's registration. >>>> >>>> I transfer a prop from coppro to Yally, as coppro identified the wrong >>>> thing (Yally missed Warrigal's activation not registration) and it's >>>> potentially excusable (depending on whether e failed to subscribe to >>>> the backup lists at all, failed to filter them to folders in a way e >>>> would properly notice, etc.). >>>> >>> >>> I transfer a prop from Yally to coppro, as I don't believe this >>> outweighs coppro's complaint. >> >> I transfer a prop from Murphy, for thinking that coppro's prop >> transfer was punishable, to comex, for reversing the punishment.
I'm treating it as unsuccessful, as it was unclear whether you intended TTttPF or not. (Of course, nothing is stopping you from re-posting with an explicit TTttPF.)
