On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Alternatively, they could have been given chaotic numbers like 14000001
> through 14010000, so that the orderly numbers would still roughly
> reflect the number of distinct statements.

That's roughly what you tried, isn't it?  Zefram and you attempted to
counter-scam by (among other things) giving them the chaotic numbers
Sparta0000-Sparta9999.

Reply via email to