On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 09/30/2010 09:14 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > coppro wrote: > > > > > On 09/30/2010 07:28 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > > > > I CFJ on the statement "At some time in the past, Keba was the Speaker", > > > > barring Wooble. > > > > > > > > Arguments: Rule 2315 only allows initialisation the List of Succession > > > > "as soon as possible after this proposal takes effect"; unfortunately, > > > > rule 2315 is not a proposal, so this never happened. Thus, as far as I > > > > can tell the List of Succession was never initially initalised. > > > > > > > > I'm not entirely sure what knock-on effects this has/had, or how much > > > > has ratified away by now; luckily it didn't happen so long ago that it's > > > > going to be impossible to calculate the resulting effects. I'd > > > > appreciate judicial input on whether there actually was a mistake, > > > > though, before trying to figure out what effects it had. > > > > > > > > > > TRUE; the IADoP's report has self-ratified. > > > > Herald's, but yeah, if the list self-ratified (per Rule 2314) at any > > point then the first paragraph of Rule 2315 is no longer relevant. > > The IADoP reports on the Speaker; the Herald's report on the list has also > self-ratified, but that is not directly related to the inquiry.
Indeed, since the Speaker CANNOT be on the list, it's not clear what happens to a list that incorrectly contains the speaker or if the IADoP and Herald's List are at odds when they self-ratify (is it, in fact, the List in the first place?). Since they have both self-ratified consistently this time, I'm guessing no problem. -G.
