On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 21:34 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote: > On 09/24/2010 09:01 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > > Taral wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > >>> At the end of each week, if the number of Rests (R) in the current > >>> Pariah's possession that were destroyed during that week [and > >>> while e was Pariah] [and since e most recently became Pariah] is > >>> greater than 6, then e gains R-6 Rests. > >> > >> Destroyed rests are no longer in the player's possession... > > > > Would "the number of Rests (R) that were destroyed in the current > > Pariah's possession during that week" work? > > Same problem
"Destroyed from the Pariah's possession" is the usual wording. On another note, making the Rests come back at the end of the week rather than instantly leaves a window for a Rest-destroying scam to get down to 0 before the Rests are recreated. -- ais523
