On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 13:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Tanner L. Swett wrote:
>
> > I submit a proposal, titled "Spelling reform begins with Agora", with
> > AI = 1.0 and II = 1, and make it distributable by fee:
> >
> > {In all rules, replace all instances of the string "judge" (and the
> > string "judg" where it is not followed by an "e") with the string
> > "juj".}
>
> Would this fail because it doesn't specify the order in which the
> rules are amended?
As far as I can tell, rule 754 allows the Rulekeepor to do this
unilaterally anyway, or even to revert the change immediately after it's
made.
--
ais523
