Tanner L. Swett wrote: > I submit a proposal, titled "Spelling reform begins with Agora", with > AI = 1.0 and II = 1, and make it distributable by fee: > > {In all rules, replace all instances of the string "judge" (and the > string "judg" where it is not followed by an "e") with the string > "juj".}
Would this fail because it doesn't specify the order in which the rules are amended?