On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > and appending this paragraph: > > Casting ballots without explicitly specifying the number of > ballots to be cast (e.g. "FOR" instead of "FOR*1" or "FOR*3") > is equivalent to conditionally casting a number of such ballots > equal to one's voting limit on that decision. > > Repeal Rule 2280 (Implicit Votes). > > [Allow denouncing to do the obvious thing in e.g. a two-candidate > election. Explicitly interpret e.g. "FOR" in the obvious fashion of > "FOR*whatever my voting limit is when it matters". Note that 2127 > is Power=1 while 2280 is Power=3.]
I don't think this works. Rule 2127 allows submitting a conditionally valued vote, but not a vote submitted a conditional number of times.
