Taral wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Taral <tar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> REMAND. > > Hm, this doesn't work.
Yes it does, I noticed this problem a while back and got this
added to Rule 911:
If prejudice is not
explicitly specified, then an opinion indicating AFFIRM or
REMAND implicitly indicates without prejudice, while an opinion
indicating REMIT or OVERRULE implicitly indicates with
prejudice.
