On 09/09/2010 06:15 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
G. cast 7 valid ballots on the decision to adopt proposal 6830.
Poking in to note that casting 7 valid ballots and voting 7 times are not the same. Also, my interpretation of this has always been that a simple FOR is exactly the same as FORx5 or FORx3 or FORxN where N is the voting limit. Whether the limit changes later is immaterial, however, if it goes down, then only the new limit of votes are counted (if, on the other hand, it goes up, then only the old limit are counted unless additional ballots are submitted.) This seems, to me, the only logical way to interpret the rules. When chamber was around, I was going to attempt a forcethrough scam based on this, but it turns out that you really didn't need that to get a random proposal passed (see, for instance, my win).
I should (hopefully) be back next week. -coppro
